Vol. 1, No. 1, Spring 2007
Download the entire journal at this link, or browse the individual sections below.
Motivated by a remarkable 18th-century result about
polyhedra known as Euler's formula, we will develop the notion of
the Euler characteristic
in the more modern context of
CW complexes. The fact that
is a homotopy invariant gives an
easy (perhaps trivializing) proof of Euler's formula. We then
develop two non-elementary methods of computing
in specific
cases: Morse theory and the Poincaré-Hopf Index Theorem. Both
will be used to compute the Euler characteristic of closed
orientable surfaces, using culinary analogies. In an appendix, the
former will also be used to compute the Euler characteristic of real
projective space.
in the more modern context of
CW complexes. The fact that
is a homotopy invariant gives an
easy (perhaps trivializing) proof of Euler's formula. We then
develop two non-elementary methods of computing
in specific
cases: Morse theory and the Poincaré-Hopf Index Theorem. Both
will be used to compute the Euler characteristic of closed
orientable surfaces, using culinary analogies. In an appendix, the
former will also be used to compute the Euler characteristic of real
projective space.
The focus of this paper is the famous theorem on primes in
arithmetic progressions due to Dirichlet: if
and
are relatively prime integers, then there exist infinitely many
primes of the form
with
a positive integer. The proof
of this theorem in the general case uses analytic techniques, and in
fact some key statements heavily rely on complex analysis. The case
, however, can be handled by purely algebraic methods as we
will show in Section 2.1 following suggestions given in [La]. In Section 2.2,
we will outline the idea of the proof of Dirichlet's theorem as it
is presented in [IR] and [Kn] for the case
.
Finally, in Section 2.3, after a brief discussion of characters of finite
abelian groups following [Se], we will present the proof of
Dirichlet's theorem (cf. [IR,Kn,Se]).
and
are relatively prime integers, then there exist infinitely many
primes of the form
with
a positive integer. The proof
of this theorem in the general case uses analytic techniques, and in
fact some key statements heavily rely on complex analysis. The case
, however, can be handled by purely algebraic methods as we
will show in Section 2.1 following suggestions given in [La]. In Section 2.2,
we will outline the idea of the proof of Dirichlet's theorem as it
is presented in [IR] and [Kn] for the case
.
Finally, in Section 2.3, after a brief discussion of characters of finite
abelian groups following [Se], we will present the proof of
Dirichlet's theorem (cf. [IR,Kn,Se]).
This project is based on the study of two kinds of representation theory: quiver representation theory and Lie algebra representation theory.
By looking at some simple examples, we'll show how the two are connected.
Indeed, we'll identify the isomophism classes of simple and indecomposable representations of a particular quiver with relation with the equivalence classes of simple and indecomposable representations of
.
.
Complex networks such as the World Wide Web and social relationship networks are prevalent in the real world, and many exhibit similar structural properties.
In this paper, a fitness-based model is developed for these complex networks.
This model employs a purely "better-get-richer" method of network construction that is believed to realistically simulate the growth process of most real-world networks.
Both computer-simulated results and theoretical analysis show that the degree distribution of networks created with this model depends on the distribution of vertex fitnesses; a power-law fitness distribution results in the commonly observed scale-free network structure.
In addition, results indicate a small average path length and large clustering coefficient, in accordance with real-world phenomena.
It is proposed that this model may serve as a possible explanation of the prevalence of scale-free networks in the real world.
The practice of neglecting small terms of an equation is analyzed in the
case of polynomial root approximations. Our discussion centers on the
following new result: The roots of a polynomial can be approximated
self-consistently by roots of much simpler equations consisting of pairs of terms from the polynomial.
The ABC conjecture is a central open problem in modern number theory,
connecting results, techniques and questions ranging from elementary
number theory and algebra to the arithmetic of elliptic curves
to algebraic geometry and even to entire functions of a complex variable.
The conjecture asserts that, in a precise sense that we specify later,
if
are relatively prime integers such that
then
cannot all have many repeated prime factors.
This expository article outlines some of the connections between
this assertion and more familiar Diophantine questions, following
(with the occasional scenic detour) the historical route from
Pythagorean triples via Fermat's Last Theorem
to the formulation of the ABC conjecture by Masser and Oesterlé.
We then state the conjecture and give a sample of its many consequences
and the few very partial results available.
Next we recite Mason's proof of an analogous assertion for polynomials
that implies, among other things, that one cannot
hope to disprove the ABC conjecture using a polynomial identity
such as the one that solves the Diophantine equation
.
We conclude by solving a Putnam problem
that predates Mason's theorem but is solved using the same method,
and outlining some further open questions and fragmentary results
beyond the ABC conjecture.
are relatively prime integers such that
then
cannot all have many repeated prime factors.
This expository article outlines some of the connections between
this assertion and more familiar Diophantine questions, following
(with the occasional scenic detour) the historical route from
Pythagorean triples via Fermat's Last Theorem
to the formulation of the ABC conjecture by Masser and Oesterlé.
We then state the conjecture and give a sample of its many consequences
and the few very partial results available.
Next we recite Mason's proof of an analogous assertion for polynomials
that implies, among other things, that one cannot
hope to disprove the ABC conjecture using a polynomial identity
such as the one that solves the Diophantine equation
.
We conclude by solving a Putnam problem
that predates Mason's theorem but is solved using the same method,
and outlining some further open questions and fragmentary results
beyond the ABC conjecture.
Unlike any other article in this journal, this one begins with a warning: Categories, beautiful and powerful as they may
be, are not panacea and should be used with great prudence. This short note
presents a fun, but silly use of categories.
The President and Fellows of Harvard College
Cambridge, MA 02138
